Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

A Look Inside the Inaugural Washington Commanders Draft Under General Manager Adam Peters

Inside the first Washington Commanders draft of the Adam Peters regime



On the final day of April’s NFL draft, Washington Commanders GM Adam Peters called a morning meeting to gather his staff before the big event. Peters, who had been on the job for three intense months, wanted to ensure that his organization was ready for the draft. During the meeting, which they called the “Commanders Caucus,” executives, scouts, and coaches huddled in the draft room to discuss potential prospects they were interested in.

One prospect that emerged as a favorite during the caucus was Temple linebacker Jordan Magee. Despite not being well known initially, Magee’s impressive qualities were brought to light by a scout during a presentation. His performance on film and his potential sparked interest among the staff members, with nearly every department advocating for his selection.

When Washington’s turn came in the fifth round, they were thrilled to see Magee still available at No. 139. GM Adam Peters wasted no time in selecting him, considering it the ultimate organizational pick. This choice exemplified the open and collaborative process that had been a hallmark of their draft preparations.

Washington’s assistant GM Lance Newmark discussed the thought process behind each draft pick in a recent interview. He commended the dedication of the personnel department, including scouts and representatives who played a crucial role in identifying prospects for the team.

Each of Washington’s draft selections, highlighted below, was meticulously chosen based on scouting reports and internal discussions:

– Round 1 (2): Jayden Daniels*
– Round 2 (36): DL Johnny Newton, Illinois*
– Round 2 (50): CB Mike Sainristil, Michigan*
– Round 2 (53): TE Ben Sinnott, Kansas State*

The decision-making process for these picks involved thorough evaluations, extensive scouting trips, and collaborative discussions with the coaching staff. Washington’s draft board and grading system were portrayed in a behind-the-scenes video, offering fans a glimpse into the team’s meticulous approach to player selection.

Despite challenges such as player injuries and trade negotiations, the Commanders were able to secure key players they believed would contribute positively to the team. The draft marked a successful step in Washington’s rebuilding process, guided by a clear vision for the future success of the organization.