Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Alcaraz cruises into second round

Alcaraz cruises into second round


Carlos Alcaraz

After missing the 2023 Australian Open, Carlos Alcaraz returned to Melbourne Park in winning fashion on Tuesday night. Alcaraz kicked off his fortnight with a 7-6(5), 6-1, 6-2 victory over Richard Gasquet, advancing in two hours and 22 minutes.

The second-ranked Spaniard struck nine aces, saved both of the break points he faced, and more than doubled his unforced error count with winners (53 to 26).

“In the first set I struggled a little bit with his game,” Alcaraz admitted. “Richard was playing great, as well, but every set I [played] better and better and in the end I played quite a good level…. He’s been around forever. He’s an amazing player. He has a lot of talent. His backhand is amazing; it’s crazy. He did a pretty good first set and then I [played] my own game.”

Nine of 10 seeded men who took the court on Tuesday joined Alcaraz in round two. The only exception was Alexander Bublik, from whom you never know what you are going to get on any given day. It was most definitely the bad Bublik against qualifier Sumit Nagal, as the 31st-ranked Kazakh turned in nine double-faults and was broken a ridiculous six times in just three sets on the way to a 6-4, 6-2, 7-6(5) loss.

Nagal lost two consecutive service points at 6-3 an 6-4 in the tiebreaker only to be gifted his third match point when Bublik appropriately double-faulted.

“You can talk about my spirit,” said Nagal, who is listed at 5’10” and 152 pounds and comes in at No. 137 in the rankings. “But i it’s also true that I’m not a very tall guy, so every game is important–every point becomes important. If I get a small chance to put pressure on a big server like Sascha, I should take it. He can play incredible tennis for 15 minutes and for the next 15 he can give you some free points; because of [that] you fight for every point.”

Nagal is the first Indian man to beat a seeded opponent at a Grand Slam since 1989 (Ramesh Krishnan over Mats Wilander in round two of the Australian Open).

Although the seeds mostly dominated on Tuesday, there was plenty of drama on display. Five matches went the five-set distance, including a dramatic 7-6(1), 2-6, 6-7(4), 6-1, 7-6(10-8) victory for Thanasi Kokkinakis over Sebastian Ofner. In other five-set results, Jerry Shang beat Mackenzie McDonald, Jack Draper overcame Marcos Giron, Arthur Cazaux edged Laslo Djere, and Tallon Griekspoor recovered from two sets down to defeat Roman Safiullin.



Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.