Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Are Bruins Leaning More Toward a DeBrusk Extension or a Trade?

Are Bruins Leaning More Toward a DeBrusk Extension or a Trade?


As per the Boston Herald’s Steve Conroy, Boston Bruins General Manager Don Sweeney is looking to acquire a physical presence on the blue line. The hope is to land someone they see as a more cost-effective option compared to high-priced players like Elias Lindholm. Given the Bruins’ cap constraints and limited futures, pursuing a robust defenseman at a cost-effective price could be the smarter choice. However, before addressing the blue line, Sweeney faces the crucial task of deciding the future of Jake DeBrusk. That includes analyzing the option of an extension or a trade.

DeBrusk is set to become an unrestricted free agent on July 1. The forward has become a pivotal and divisive figure on the roster. He has proven himself as a valuable player, showcasing versatility and two-way skills. He’s also been inconsistent and has not reached top-star levels, making offering a lucrative extension somewhat of a risk.

Jake DeBrusk: Bruins want an extension or a trade?

Transforming his game over the years, DeBrusk has evolved into a reliable two-way player with the ability to contribute offensively and defensively. Conroy notes, “When he’s on he’s very good. And while the debate of his worth can be wide-ranging, he is not a player you can let walk away for nothing.” Still, you have to give to get. If the Bruins want to make a big trade, moving a player like DeBrusk might be what it takes.

Will a Team Want to Trade For and Sign DeBrusk?

Making a trade for DeBrusk won’t be easy if the Bruins are seeking a solid return. This is especially true is there’s no guarantee of the forward being anything more than a rental. As for the cost to re-sign DeBrusk (should they want to), it could be high. Conroy suggests the recent eight-year, $6.2 million annual salary extension for the Flyers’ Owen Tippett provides a benchmark.

As the Bruins navigate what to do ahead of the trade deadline and the kind of player to prioritize, they’ll have to consider the market. What is DeBrusk worth in multiple scenarios? He could be extended, then traded (which the Bruins almost did once before). He could be traded with no extension. Or, DeBrusk could be signed and retained by the Bruins. He wants to stay, but do the Bruins want to keep him more than they want a defender or a bigger fish?

Next: Jake Guentzel Rejects Massive Extension Offer From Penguins








Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.