Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Are the Bruins Rethinking Their Arbitration Choices with Jeremy Swayman?

Jeremy Swayman Boston Bruins


Elliotte Friedman noted during his most recent episode of the 32 Thoughts podcast that the Boston Bruins might be rethinking the way they’ve handled contract negotiations with goaltender Jeremy Swayman. Noting that they both wish they hadn’t taken him to arbitration last season, the club might be wishing they did this summer considering how things have played out of late.

Friedman explained that he doesn’t believe that Swayman and the Bruins are getting any closer to finalizing a contract extension. Considering how long this is taking, the people Friedman talked to wondered if the team would go back in time and do arbitration the arbitration they did with him last year. Thinking Swayman never really got over that experience, he’s not willing to bend at all now when it comes to a new contract.

So too, Friedman believes that choosing to forego arbitration this summer might have been viewed as a mistake. He wonders if the Bruins would have preferred to just take Swayman to arbitration for a second time and let him choose the one or two-year term.

The downside of that was that Swayman could have walked himself right into unrestricted free agency. That is why the Bruins wanted to avoid arbitration now, but the NHL insider is thinking that since Swayman seems to be holding out for more money, the Bruins might have preferred to get the deal done, not have it drag into the 2024-25 season and try to sort out a longer extension before things got problematic at the end of the second season. In other words, the Bruins could have punted the problem down the road.

Jeremy Swayman and Bruins arbitration has posed a problem

As it stands now, the Bruins have a goaltender who has ill feelings toward the organization for dragging him through arbitration once and he’s not going to do them any favors knowing he’s got some leverage, even as an RFA.

Why Did the Bruins Trade Ullmark Knowing Swayman Was Upset?

When asked why the Bruins would have traded Linus Ullmark knowing that all of this could blow up their faces, Friedman suggested that the ability for Ullmark to change the teams on his no-trade list was a potential concern. They wanted to be able to make the move they did, sending Ullmark to Ottawa. The fact that could have gone sideways on them was something they were concerned about.

Next: 3 Reasons to Expect New Heights for Morgan Rielly in 2024-25