Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

College basketball rankings: Auburn vaults into top 10 after historic lopsided win over South Carolina

College basketball rankings: Auburn vaults into top 10 after historic lopsided win over South Carolina


top25and1auburn.png
CBS Sports graphic

South Carolina’s résumé is better than its computer numbers. Auburn’s computer numbers are better than its résumé. That’s the simplest explanation for how we ended up in a situation where a lower-ranked team was an 11.5-point favorite over a higher-ranked team Wednesday — because efficiency margins matter more to the betting markets than Quadrant 1 wins.

Did you take all those points? If so, you made a mistake.

Final score: Auburn 101, South Carolina 61.

The 40-point win represented the Tigers’ largest margin of victory in history against a top-25 opponent and the largest margin of victory for any school against a top-15 team in the AP Top 25 poll since Villanova beat Oklahoma 95-51 in the 2016 Final Four. Auburn shot 61.0% from the field, 60.0% from 3-point range and 89.5% from the free throw line in the blowout, meaning this was nearly an amazing 60-60-90 performance. 

“We made shots and played with great freedom,” said Auburn coach Bruce Pearl. “We also disrupted them defensively. We turned them over and were aggressive and made plenty of offense out of our defense.”

Pearl’s Tigers jumped from No. 14 to No. 9 in Thursday morning’s updated CBS Sports Top 25 And 1 daily college basketball rankings, which caused North Carolina and Kansas to be pushed down one spot each, no fault of their own. Next up for Auburn is Saturday’s showdown with Kentucky inside Neville Arena, where the Tigers are 13-0 this season with each of those 13 wins coming by double digits. Auburn’s average margin of victory at home this season is 22.1 points. That’s among the reasons KenPom.com is projecting the Tigers as 10-point favorites over John Calipari’s Wildcats, who will enter with a 6-6 record in the first two quadrants with just two Q1 victories. UK also has one additional loss to Wilmington in Quadrant 3.

Itching for more college hoops analysis? Listen below and subscribe to the Eye on College Basketball podcast where we take you beyond the hardwood with insider information and instant reactions.

Top 25 And 1 rankings

Biggest Movers





Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.