Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Did the Chargers have any intentions of re-signing Keenan Allen?

Did the Chargers have any intentions of re-signing Keenan Allen?


This offseason, the Chargers were left in a rough cap space situation. Los Angeles needed to make serious cuts this offseason to get under the cap for 2024. Four key players were all reportedly on the chopping block. Joey Bosa, Khalil Mack, Mike Williams, and Keenan Allen all had significant cap hits for 2024. 

Bosa and Mack took pay cuts this offseason to stay with the team. Williams tested his luck in free agency and signed a two-year deal with the New York Jets. Then there’s Keenan Allen. The 31-year-old is coming off another outstanding season. However, the team traded Allen to the Bears for a fourth-round pick. Now, Allen’s agent refutes that Los Angeles made more than one offer to Pro Bowl WR. It’s as if GM Joe Hortiz had already made up his mind about trading Allen no matter what.

Did the Chargers give Keenan Allen a fair chance to re-sign with the team?

The 2023 season was Keenan Allen’s 11th with the Chargers and his last with the franchise. After a career-high 150 receptions last season, Los Angeles traded him away to the Bears. Initially, it was a shock to see Allen traded to Chicago for just a fourth-round pick. However, his end with the Chargers became complicated. Yesterday, Chargers’ GM Joe Hortiz spoke with the media about why the team was not able to get a deal done with Allen.

Hortiz told reporters that the team approached Allen multiple times about his contract issue. Signing Allen to a contract extension was mentioned. However, Joe Hortiz made it seem like Allen was not willing to work with the team. So they traded him to the Bears. That’s where Allen’s agent Joby Branion went on X last night to refute those comments by Hortiz. Branion explained how just one offer was made to Keenan Allen. It was a significant pay cut. Additionally, they had a two-year extension offered to Allen with even deeper pay cuts than in 2024.

Keenan Allen’s party tried to make a counter-offer with the Chargers after they offered him an extension. It was then rejected by the team and Allen was later informed they planned to trade him. A bumpy end to his time in Los Angeles. Regardless, Allen is stepping into what will be one of the most intriguing teams in 2024. Chicago has the first overall pick and they’re going to take Caleb Williams. The rookie QB will have Keenan Allen and D.J. Moore as his top two targets on offense.





Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.