Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Djokovic, Sinner, Rublev all dominate

Djokovic, Sinner, Rublev all dominate



Jannik Sinner has been rolling along nicely this entire week on his expected way to an Australian Open semifinal showdown against Novak Djokovic. On Friday, Djokovic finally matched–or at least came close–to the Italian’s level of dominance.

Following Sinner’s 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 rout of Sebastian Baez during the afternoon session, Djokovic treated the nighttime crowd to a 6-3, 6-3, 7-6(2) victory over Tomas Martin Etcheverry. The world No. 1 fired 10 aces without double-faulting a single time and did not face a single break point while prevailing in two hours and 28 minutes.

“It was a great match, I think,” Djokovic assessed. “The best performance I had during this tournament. Obviously I’m pleased with the way I played throughout the entire match, particularly the first two sets.

“[Etcheverry] stepped it up–raised his level of tennis probably one or two levels in the third set and we went toe-to-toe. In the tiebreak I guess I just found the right shots, the right serves, and closed it out in straights.”

Djokovic previously needed four sets against both Dino Prizmic and Alexei Popyrin.

Sinner, on the other hand, was dominant from start to finish during his trek to week two. He did not drop a set or even get pushed to a tiebreaker while ousting Botic van de Zandschulp, Jasper de Jong, and Baez. Against Baez, Sinner struck six aces and no double-faults, had seven more winners than unforced errors, and saved all four of the break points he faced. The 22-year-old required just one hour and 52 minutes to advance.

“I think I played really well and I feel great here,” Sinner commented.

The world No. 4 may have keep up his scorching-hot level of play–which dates back to last fall–if he wants to set up the dream semifinal against Djokovic. Things will only get tougher for Sinner, with Karen Khachanov up next followed by a potential quarterfinal date with either Andrey Rublev or Alex de Minaur.

Much to the Aussie crowd’s delight, De Minaur has not lost a set through three rounds. The world No. 10, whose current six-match winning streak includes a United Cup upset of Djokovic, destroyed Flavio Cobolli 6-3, 6-3, 6-1 on Friday. Rublev, meanwhile, was extended to a fifth-set tiebreaker by Thiago Seyboth Wild in round one but has since defeated Chris Eubanks and Sebastian Korda in straights.

Elsewhere in the top half of the bracket, fourth-round action pits Stefanos Tsitsipas against Taylor Fritz. Tsitsipas eased past Luca Van Assche in straight sets; Fritz beat Fabian Marozsan in 4.



Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.