Transfer Market Insights: Record Spending in 2025
During the summer transfer window, football clubs globally invested a staggering $9.76 billion on acquiring nearly 12,000 players, marking record figures according to FIFA. This expenditure was over 50% higher than the previous summer, with around 1,000 additional players switching teams compared to 2024.
Clubs within UEFA dominated this spending, totaling $8.5 billion—an increase of $3 billion from the prior year. Approximately 7,350 players transferred to new teams within UEFA, and about 20% of these involved transfer fees, averaging $4.27 million. This figure reflects a $1.2 million increase in average fees from 2024.
As expected, the greatest transfer activity took place among teams in Europe’s Big Five leagues. English clubs led the charge, with $3.19 billion spent, while Spain, Germany, France, and Italy each surpassed $650 million. Altogether, clubs in these five nations accounted for $6.5 billion, representing two-thirds of the global market.
Data from Transfermarkt indicates that there were 203 transfers exceeding €10 million in these leagues this summer. However, as of mid-November, those players have collectively participated in only 45% of their respective teams’ minutes. More expensive transfers, those costing at least €35 million, fared slightly better, accounting for 49% of playing time.
With such significant sums spent merely to obtain players—excluding the costs associated with contracts—two expectations arise: (1) clubs anticipate these players to contribute significantly more than just 45% of game time, and (2) they are typically strategizing for the long haul, beyond just the first several matches of the season.
At this point, it’s premature to declare any transfers as failures or triumphant successes. Nevertheless, teams cannot extend player contracts simply based on a rocky start, nor can they reclaim lost points from games where new signings took time to acclimate. Those matches are lost and cannot be revisited.
Now that nearly a third of the season has elapsed, let’s examine the 10 worst and 5 best performances from transfers so far.
Evaluating Poor Transfers
By nature, the most disappointing deals among the 203 transfers above €10 million are often the costliest. Analyzing “value left on the bench,” which calculates a player’s transfer fee multiplied by the percentage of minutes he has not played, heavily favors the more expensive deals.
Here are the current top 10 underperforming transfers in the Big Five leagues:
1) Alexander Isak, Liverpool: €107.88 million left unused
2) Yoane Wissa, Newcastle: €57.7 million
3) Nick Woltemade, Newcastle: €46.95 million
4) Xavi Simons, Tottenham: €43.2 million
5) Jamie Gittens, Chelsea: €41.83 million
6) Noni Madueke, Arsenal: €38.7 million
7) Tyler Dibling, Everton: €37.95 million
8) Omari Hutchinson, Nottingham Forest: €37.8 million
9) Florian Wirtz, Liverpool: €37.5 million
10) Jorrel Hato, Chelsea: €36.71 million
Liverpool set a new Premier League transfer record for an often-injured player, Isak, who has only participated in about a quarter of the league minutes to date. Similarly, Wirtz, who prior to Isak set a Premier League transfer record, has played 70% of the minutes but still appears in the bottom 10 of this evaluation.
The trend holds true across the league; Premier League clubs led global spending, thus their transfers overwhelmingly populate the list of poor performances. Only one transfer from outside the Premier League ranks among the lowest 20 so far this season.
n
