Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ITIA CEO Addresses Misunderstandings Surrounding Sinner and Swiatek Doping Incidents

ITIA CEO Addresses Misunderstandings Surrounding Sinner and Swiatek Doping Incidents

Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek both tested positive for a banned substance and faced suspension, but the processes have raised questions among fans worldwide.

Sinner was the first of the two to test positive for a banned substance. The Italian player had a positive result at the 2024 Indian Wells Open. He was cleared of wrongdoing by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA), but the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) later appealed the case.

Eventually, Sinner agreed to a three-month suspension after reaching an agreement with WADA. The ATP World No. 1 is currently out of action and is expected to return at the Italian Open in Rome.

Conversely, Swiatek received a one-month ban from the ITIA. She missed tournaments in Asia but made a brief return for the WTA Finals and the Billie Jean King Cup Finals before completing her suspension.

Throughout most of these situations, fans were unaware of the positive tests. Swiatek stated that her absence from tournaments was for various reasons, even as she was provisionally suspended.

The ITIA has faced criticism for its practices, yet its CEO, Karen Moorhouse, stands firmly by the processes. She explained that many fans mistakenly believed the ITIA was responsible for announcing positive tests, when their duty was to announce provisional suspensions. Since both Sinner and Swiatek appealed their cases successfully, the situations went public only later.

“It was mistakenly believed that we were announcing positive tests, when, in reality, we were announcing provisional suspensions.”

“In both the case of Sinner – and in that of Swiatek – the rules were respected. The players filed an appeal against the provisional suspension within the 10-day period provided for by our regulations and, since the appeal was successful, the provisional suspensions were not made public.”

Moorhouse also compared tennis to other sports, noting the ten-day appeal rule currently in place and hinting it could change in the future.

“Some sports, such as athletics, decide to immediately announce provisional suspensions. Others, especially team sports, never announce them. Tennis, for now, has given itself the ten-day rule; we’ll see if this rule changes in the future.”

The ITIA CEO was asked about the lack of action against Giacomo Naldi and Umberto Ferrara, who were part of Sinner’s team and involved in the contamination. Moorhouse clarified that they were not punished since their actions weren’t deemed intentional.

“There was no justification for prosecuting any member of his entourage because the assumption, namely the intentionality of taking doping substances, was missing.”