Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Medvedev vs Khachanov, De Minaur vs Popyrin

Medvedev vs Khachanov, De Minaur vs Popyrin


Medvedev 2
Getty Images

Karen Khachanov will get a first crack at Daniil Medvedev on clay, while Aussies Alex de Minaur and Alexei Popyrin do battle at the Monte-Carlo Masters on Thursday. Spots in the quarterfinals are on the line.

(4) Daniil Medvedev vs. Karen Khachanov

World No. 17 Karen Khachanov hasn’t had much luck against countryman and world No. 5 Daniil Medvedev recently–and by “not much” I mean basically none at all. Khachanov hasn’t beaten Medvedev since 2018. It has mostly been good news for Medvedev when Khachanov is on the other side of the net. But it’s worth noting that they have never played on clay. Each of their previous matches has been on hard courts; Medvedev, of course, is a self-proclaimed hard-court specialist.

Khachanov has kept their two most recent matches competitive and given Medvedev’s spotty record on clay (he’s 28-26 lifetime on the surface), the world No. 17 may have a better chance at getting a win over his Davis Cup teammate than he usually does. Medvedev’s runs on clay tend to be streaky. He won the Masters 1000 event in Rome last year and then promptly lost in the first round of the French Open. Look for the higher-ranked Russian to find a way through.

Cheryl pick: Medvedev in 3

Ricky pick: Khachanov in 3

(11) Alex de Minaur vs. Alexei Popyrin

Alex de Minaur is hovering just outside the top 10 at the No. 11 spot. He has enjoyed a fantastic start to the season that has included a final in Rotterdam (lost to Jannik Sinner) and the title in Acapulco. The problem for the Aussie is that clay is by far his worst surface, on which he has a losing record. He is off to a good start in Monte-Carlo, though with, an emphatic win over Stan Wawrinka in the first round and a scrappy one over Tallon Griekspoor in the second.

Alex de Minaur

While De Minaur has been less than convincing on the dirt in his career, he is generally playing well right now. Alexei Popyrin, who is ranked 46th in the world, also had a good start to the season–but his countryman is just a better overall player. This one might be more competitive than their ranking would suggest, but expect De Minaur to pull through.

Cheryl pick: De Minaur in 3

Ricky pick: De Minaur in 2



Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.