Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Oilers Added Top-4 D-Man in Offer to Flames For Tanev [Rumor]

Oilers Added Top-4 D-Man in Offer to Flames For Tanev [Rumor]


The Calgary Flames traded Chris Tanev to the Dallas Stars this week. That wasn’t before getting several offers from other teams, including one that was believed to have come from the Edmonton Oilers. Interestingly, it is believed the Oilers offered more than the Stars in return but had an asterisk on the deal that didn’t interest Dallas.

According to Pierre LeBrun, it’s his understanding that the Flames did receive an offer including a first-round pick from one of the other teams interested in Tanev. He notes in a recent article for The Athletic, that the offer wasn’t solely for a first-round pick; it also required Calgary to take on a player with term left on their contract. It is believed that might have been Oilers’ defenseman Cody Ceci.

Cody Ceci was rumored to have been offered along with a first-round pick for Chris Tanev

The Flames found this condition less appealing, and understandably so. LeBrun admits he doesn’t know for sure that the Oilers made this offer, but said it’s plausible. He noted that either Edmonton, suggesting its first-round pick for Tanev along with Cody Ceci (locked in through the next season at a $3.25 million AAV), or Colorado, proposing a first-round pick while seeking the Flames to absorb Ryan Johansen (contracted through the next season at a $4 million AAV), might be the potential teams in question.

Related: Flames Make Huge Decision on Goaltender Jacob Markstrom

It’s not clear, although it is assumed there would be, what the salary retention would have been in the deal. Dallas ended up getting Tanev at a 75% reduced rate thanks to the Devils getting involved.

Why Would the Oilers Make This Offer?

There are a couple of reasons Edmonton might have done this. First, it’s plausible they saw Tanev as an upgrade. Second, GM Ken Holland might have been looking to move salary off of next season’s books, and with Ceci locked in for one more season, this trade could have accomplished two items on his to-do list at once.

The issue for the Oilers would have been depth on defense and what other moves might have been ruled out if the trade had gone through. Using their first-rounder on Tanev means the Oilers wouldn’t have had it for a top-six winger. Many believe that has been deemed their priority ahead of the trade deadline.

Next: Oilers Hit Hurdle While Pushing Hard for Trade Deadline Forwards








Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.