Premier League Financial Regulations Overhaul Announced
In a significant move, Premier League clubs have agreed to revamp their financial regulations starting next season, discarding the existing Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) in favor of a new framework called Squad-Cost Rules (SCR). This decision was confirmed on Friday and marks a shift towards more stringent financial oversight.
The SCR will restrict clubs to spending no more than 85% of their football-related revenue, addressing net profits and losses from player transfers. If clubs exceed the allowed spending by over 30%, they would incur a levy and would need to adhere to the 85% limit or face sporting sanctions.
This adjustment aligns the Premier League more closely with UEFA regulations, which currently mandate that clubs in its competitions allocate a maximum of 70% of their revenue to football costs. Along with the SCR, clubs have also approved new Sustainability and Systematic Resilience (SSR) measures to evaluate financial health based on three key tests: Working Capital, Liquidity, and Positive Equity.
According to sources, the vote on SSR passed without opposition, while only seven clubs backed the contentious proposal for ‘top-to-bottom anchoring’ (TBA). This proposal aimed to cap spending based on the previous season’s earnings of the lowest-ranked club. Proponents argued it would level the playing field, but concerns were raised regarding its potential impact on player salaries and competitive dynamics in the transfer market.
The Premier League emphasized that the new SCR rules aspire to foster success across all clubs, enhancing financial accountability without stifling opportunity. “The new system features in-season monitoring, protection against underperformance, and encourages investment in infrastructure, all while simplifying the focus on football costs,” a league statement declared.
This regulatory shift concludes two years of deliberations, which included trials of both SCR and TBA, allowing clubs to familiarize themselves with compliance measures. The previous PSR limited losses to £105 million ($137.2 million) over three years.
The rejection of TBA will likely generate discussions, particularly among those who believe it could have provided a competitive advantage for smaller clubs. However, industry stakeholders have raised concerns about its implications for player wages and clubs’ abilities to compete for top talent.
n
