Pedro Neto has been linked with a move away from Wolves ahead of the summer transfer window and Stan Collymore believes Man City is the only place the Portuguese winger should go next.
According to the Daily Mail, Wolves have to sell Neto to comply with Financial Fair Play regulations and the money brought in could be used to overhaul Gary O’Neil’s squad ahead of the new campaign.
The Midlands club will demand more than the £53m they received from Manchester City for Matheus Nunes last summer and any sale of the Portuguese winger is expected to cost an interested party over £60m, reports The Standard.
Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool and Tottenham are all interested in the 23-year-old, states the report, but Stan Collymore believes the Premier League champions are the obvious choice for the Wolves star.
Writing in his latest exclusive column for CaughtOffside, Stan Collymore has stated that Man City is a “no-brainer” if Neto is to leave Wolves at the end of the season as the Manchester club will guarantee the player trophies.
“There were reports this week that Pedro Neto could leave Wolves this summer and there is only one place he should go and that is Man City,” the pundit said.
“If Man City are in the conversation for Neto this summer and they were to win the Champions League and the Premier League again, it will be a no-brainer from the player’s point of view. The Manchester club could even use Nunes to lure his former teammate to the Etihad by telling him how great it is there and how much better he will get under Pep Guardiola’s watch.
“I have always felt that players want to join clubs where they have the best chance of winning trophies and that is a certainty at Man City.”
This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.
