Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Raonic Retires Against Sinner in Rotterdam Quarter-Finals

Raonic Retires Against Sinner in Rotterdam Quarter-Finals


Milos Raonic was in the midst of his best run in years when injury struck during his clash with Jannik Sinner in the Rotterdam quarter-finals. 

After dropping a tight opening set against the Australian Open champion in a tiebreak, Raonic was forced to retire early in the second set with an injury. He had received treatment midway through the first set. 

Up until the withdrawal, the match had been highly competitive, with Raonic even having set points before Sinner snuck it out in a tiebreak. The Italian ended up being handed his 200th tour-level win by a score of 7-6(4), 1-1 ret. 

In just seven service games, Raonic fired 11 aces. While both men broke serve once, Raonic had more looks with four break points, of which Sinner saved three. The Canadian had 19 winners to his opponent’s 11, but also 18 unforced errors. 

Read also: Rybakina Ends Fernandez Run in Doha Quarter-Finals

Raonic set the tone with a 233 KMH ace to start the match and won his first eight service points in a row. But in his third service game, Sinner got a few good returns in and Raonic misfired a forehand on break point to drop serve for the first time all week.  

However, the Australian Open champion was having a tough time finding a rhythm and gave Raonic a few free points in the following game to hand the break back. 

As the Italian served to stay in the set at 4-5, Raonic attacked, ripping a forehand winner to set up double break point. But Sinner was up to the challenge, using his lethal combination of big hitting and quick court coverage to erase the threat.  

Read also: Everything You Need to Know About Paris 2024

One point made the difference in the tiebreak as Sinner got the minibreak for a 3-2 lead, which turned out to be the only point to go against serve in the tiebreak.  

Raonic had received treatment at 4-3 in the first set, but that did not seem to affect his level. However, the injury proved too much early in the second set as the Canadian was forced to retire for the second tournament in a row after holding his opening service game of the set. 

RaIn the first two rounds, Raonic had defeated Jesper de Jong and eighth-seed Alexander Bublik, who had already beaten Felix Auger-Aliassime and Denis Shapovalov earlier this year, each in straight sets. 





Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.