Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Rublev vs. Mensik, Khachanov vs. Ruusuvuori

Rublev vs. Mensik, Khachanov vs. Ruusuvuori


Emil Ruusuvuori
Getty Images

Fellow Russians, top seeds, and Doha doubles partners Andrey Rublev and Karen Khachanov are part of the singles quarterfinals on Thursday. Rublev is going up against Jakub Mensik, while Khachanov is facing Emil Ruusuvuori.

(1) Andrey Rublev vs. Jakub Mensik

Rublev has been to the final of the Qatar ExxonMobile Open twice and is a former champion (2020). The fifth-ranked Russian has a great chance to win the falcon trophy for a second time as the top seed and without question the best player in the 2024 field. Rublev started his week in dominant fashion, destroying Richard Gasquet 6-3, 6-4 in a mere 56 minutes while improving to 11-2 for the season.

Up next for Rublev in the quarterfinals on Thursday is Mensik, who took a much different route to the last eight. After beating Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 7-6(3), 6-4, the 18-year-old outlasted Andy Murray 7-6(6), 6-7(3), 7-6(4) after three hours and 23 minutes on Wednesday evening. This is hardly a surprising effort by Mensik, who just reached the second round of the Australian Open as a qualifier and pushed Hubert Hurkacz to five sets. The Czech is one of the tour’s rising stars, but this is a tough ask for him with Rublev on the other side of the net and having just endured a marathon against Murray.

Pick: Rublev in 2

Emil Ruusuvuori vs. (2) Karen Khachanov

Khachanov and Ruusuvuori will be squaring off for the fourth time in their careers and for the second time in Doha when they meet again on Thursday. The head-to-head series stands at 2-1 in favor of Khachanov, who won their 2022 Doha second-round encounter 7-6(4), 6-3. However, Ruusuvuori got the best of their most recent showdown 7-6(2), 2-6, 6-2 earlier this season in Hong Kong.

Ruusuvuori ended up reaching the final in Hong Kong (lost to Andrey Rublev) and he is coming off a quarterfinal performance in Rotterdam. The 43rd-ranked Finn is now 11-4 in 2024 following Doha victories over Giulio Zeppieri and Christopher O’Connell, both in straight sets. Khachanov followed up a first-round bye with a 6-4, 7-5 defeat of Fabian Marozsan, improving to 6-3 for the season. With Ruusuvuori in great form and having won their matchup last month, the second-seeded Russian could once again be on upset alert.

Pick: Ruusuvuori in 3



Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.