Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Should the Flames Pursue Asset Acquisition Through Bad Contracts?

Flames Should Consider Taking Bad Contracts For Assets



The Calgary Flames are projected to have around $20 million in cap space this offseason as they embark on a retool/rebuild process with a focus on developing their young players. MacKenzie Weegar expressed his excitement for the team’s future in a recent interview, acknowledging that the Flames may not be competitive in the immediate future and need to acquire assets for the long term. General Manager Craig Conroy has already started making moves by trading many of the team’s pending unrestricted free agents to avoid losing them for nothing in free agency.

One strategy the Flames are considering is taking on bad contracts from other teams in exchange for assets. While this may not seem appealing at first, it can be a successful approach if executed effectively. For instance, the Montreal Canadiens acquired Sean Monahan from the Flames in the 2022 offseason when Calgary needed to free up cap space. Monahan’s trade value was low due to performance issues, so the Flames had to include assets to move his contract. However, Monahan thrived with the Canadiens and was eventually flipped for a first-round pick to the Winnipeg Jets, showcasing the value of smart asset management.

Another team known for this strategy is the Utah (formerly Arizona) franchise, which accumulated draft picks by taking on bad contracts from other teams. The Flames could follow a similar path by leveraging their cap space to absorb undesirable contracts in exchange for assets. This could potentially lead to a higher return on investment down the line if the acquired players increase their trade value while in Calgary.

One example of this approach is the situation with Andrei Kuzmenko, who was considered a “cap dump” in a trade involving Elias Lindholm. Kuzmenko struggled with the Vancouver Canucks but found success with the Flames, hinting at the potential for asset management opportunities if Calgary decides to move him as a pending unrestricted free agent.

By considering the strategy of taking on bad contracts to collect assets and potentially enhance player value, the Flames could strengthen their position for future trades and roster improvements. It’s a concept that comes with risks but offers the potential for substantial rewards in the long run.