Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Engaging in Disputes with Umpires in Tennis

Pros and Cons of Arguing with Umpires

By Richard Pagliaro | @Tennis_Now | Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Photo credit: Daniel Pockett/Getty

The high chair is a hot seat when Daniil Medvedev is playing.

Chair umpires are accustomed to taking heat from Medvedev at times.

More: WADA Appeals Sinner’s Doping Case, Seeks Ban for World No. 1

During his 7-6(3), 6-3 win over Stefanos Tsitsipas in Shanghai today, Medvedev had a tiff with chair umpire Fergus Murphy as did his Greek opponent, who was hit with a time violation.

Afterward, Medvedev reflected on the pros and cons of arguing with umpires.

Tennis Express

“I mean, I argue a lot with umpires,” Medvedev told the media in Shanghai. “So I was just waiting, and I knew that, no, just need to stay focused on myself, because sometimes it’s not easy after, like, some break to regroup yourself.

“Because actually what happens when you argue with the umpire, sometimes it distracts you, not in a good way. I think that’s what happened.”

Though Medvedev’s dispute was downright mild compared to Frances Tiafoe’s F-bomb tirade at the umpire after his loss to Roman Safiullin in Shanghai on Tuesday, the 2021 US Open champion is pragmatic about his love of the art of arguing.

Medvedev views his on-court arguments as a bit like fire. If you can control the emotional intensity, the argument can fuel the competitive inferno. If not, it can consume you and burn you apart.

“Sometimes it does give you the extra push for, like, Oh, my God, everyone is against me,” Medvedev said. “So I knew that I need to stay tough, and I managed to serve well and get the break, so, yeah, pretty happy about my level.”

How will Medvedev manage his emotion facing world No. 1 Jannik Sinner in a Shanghai quarterfinal rematch of the Australian Open final?

The former No. 1 says he plans to bring the fire and fight to the current world No. 1.

“With Sinner, yeah, I mean, we played already four times this year,” Medvedev said. “I think one was very easy for him. The other three were tougher, I played well in some of them.

“I’m going to bring the fight, I’m going to prepare tactically, mentally, physically. It’s going to be a tough match, so hopefully my body feels well, and I’m ready, yeah, to bring the fight and go for it.”