Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tom Wilson Suspension Shows “Tom Wilson Tax” a Real Thing

Tom Wilson Suspension Shows “Tom Wilson Tax” a Real Thing


Tom Wilson, notorious for his aggressive style of play and willingness to cross the line of what’s legal in the NHL, has been suspended for six games by the NHL Department of Player Safety (DoPS) following a high-sticking incident involving Noah Gregor. As expected, reactions to the suspension are divided. What seems to be universally agreed upon is that the six games are a result of it being Tom Wilson who was under review.

Notably, comparisons have been drawn between Wilson’s suspension and previous rulings, such as Jacob Trouba‘s fine for a similar offense. Greg Wyshynski of ESPN highlights the Capitals’ anticipation of a lengthier suspension, suggesting that Wilson successfully argued against intent, resulting in a ruling of “reckless” stick use. Still, the NHL DoPS came down harder than they might have if this was any other player.

The atmosphere surrounding the incident is fascinating. While the play’s recklessness is acknowledged, the six-game suspension appears to reflect Wilson’s reputation rather than solely the severity of the infraction. Commentators like Steve Dangle of SDPN characterize it as “Tom Wilson paying the Tom Wilson tax,” alluding to the player’s history of disciplinary actions.

Wilson’s History of Supplemental Discipline Will Eventually Lead to Massive Suspension

Examining Wilson’s past infractions reveals a pattern of aggressive behavior and subsequent disciplinary measures. The DoPS referenced it in the video about his high stick on Gregor. From fines for roughing to suspensions for illegal hits, Wilson’s rap sheet underscores the fact that the Department of Player Safety is prepared to crack down when he crosses the line. The next infraction could lead to a lengthy suspension, potentially in the 15 games or more range.

Tom Wilson High stick Noah Gregor

As good as Wilson is, his career remains marred by a series of incidents, prompting a longer look at his on-ice conduct and its implications for player safety. Every time he gets in trouble, the NHL DoPS will have to grapple with maintaining a fair punishment, but also consider his past. May argue there isn’t enough player accountability in professional hockey. Wilson is the kind of player the NHL might use to suggest that assumption is incorrect.

The fact the Capitals were expecting this suspension to be longer tells you all you need to know. Even they know their own guy is creeping close to being made an example of.

Next: 3 Reasons the Maple Leafs Should Re-Sign Max Domi








Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.