Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Why Djokovic Was Denied Millions In Bonus Payment By The ATP

Why Djokovic Was Denied Millions In Bonus Payment By The ATP


2023 was a record-setting year for Novak Djokovic after he surpassed his great rivals in the Grand Slam count while simultaneously reaping big in prize money.

The Serbian World No. 1 topped the podium in seven of 12 tournaments he played on the ATP Tour last season, which is the most for any player. His dominance extended beyond trophies and accolades. Djokovic topped the ATP’s prize money list by a huge margin.

He won a staggering $15,942,044, at least an additional $5 million in prize money from second-placed Carlos Alcaraz. But because of the ATP’s newly-formed scheme, OneVision, aimed at giving bonus payouts to best-performing players at the nine Masters 1000s and ATP Finals, that gap narrowed down to just thousands of dollars.

The ATP committed a bonus purse of precisely $20 million distributed based on results to the Top 30 players with the most points clubbed together from the nine Masters tournaments and the year-end championships. Alcaraz comfortably finished on top, raking a colossal sum in the region of $4.4 million.

Djokovic was in the top five of that club, having won two Masters tournaments (becoming the first man to attain 40 Masters titles) and a record-breaking 7th ATP Finals crown. However, the ATP’s bonus plan has strict eligibility criteria that Djokovic didn’t meet.

A look at Djokovic’s schedule last season shows that the ATP adhered to every line in its rulebook. First, to be paid the full bonus, players must play the mandatory Masters and ATP Finals should they qualify.

Secondly, the ATP reserved the right to reduce bonus payments based on the number of tournaments missed by a qualifying player. For instance, if a player missed one Masters tournament, the bonus would be reduced by 25%.

Missing two would result in a reduction by half while giving three Masters tournaments a miss would equal a 75% reduction in bonus. In Djokovic’s case, he missed five of the nine Masters tournaments, which the ATP was entitled to wipe off 100% of the bonus payout as stipulated in its rulebook.

Nevertheless, Djokovic still topped the prize money list even after factoring in the bonuses for the rest of the qualifying players. The bonus payments to the players will be made by the end of January 2024.

=https://twitter.com/AnnaK_4ever/status/1736691826390597695?s=20″ data-service=”twitter”>





Source link

This website aggregates and curates news articles, blog posts, and other content from a variety of external sources. While we aim to link back to the original source, this site does not own or claim ownership of any articles, posts, or other content indexed on this site. The views, opinions, and factual statements expressed in each piece of aggregated content belong solely to its respective author and publisher. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of aggregated content. Visitors are advised to verify facts and claims through the original source before reuse or redistribution.